Evidence policy
Clinical judgment should be accountable to the evidence and clear about its limits.
Model validity: does the model measure what it claims? Interpretation method: are the conclusions drawn appropriately? Content accuracy: is the explanation faithful to the evidence? Workflow safety: are safeguards working? Outcomes: what changed for people, under which conditions? Evidence for one question is not proof of another.
When a result is published, the account identifies the population, duration, method and relevant limitations. Model-estimated years do not represent calendar years gained. A multimodal evaluation cannot establish which individual component caused a change.
Clinical eligibility and recommendations are independent of price, relationship level and investment interests. Where scientific or investment affiliations are discussed, the relationship and its limits must be visible.
Medical content is prepared for named authorship, physician review and dated revisions. If you would like to question a statement or request its source, contact the clinic. Publication status should be explicit wherever a report is not yet available.
Begin with the Healthy Longevity Plan, or arrange a private conversation about broader assessment and ongoing care.
